Proving Goldbach's conjecture.
Page 1 of 1 • Share •
Proving Goldbach's conjecture.
What approach should be taken in proving Goldbach's conjecture? Just as Andrew Wiles proved Fermat's Last Theorem via a connection between Modular Forms/Elliptic Curves and Number Theory (via the Taniyama–Shimura conjecture), which branch of mathematics do you expect could be used to prove said conjecture? I hear that a connection between modern theoretical physics, and number theory, has been made by a Russian mathematician as a proof - but due to a lack of rigour, it has been shunned.
Alternatively, do you think that such a proof could be achieved via pure number theory? A true, rigorous, proof - one for 'The Book' (Erdos)?
Alternatively, do you think that such a proof could be achieved via pure number theory? A true, rigorous, proof - one for 'The Book' (Erdos)?
CryMax- Azure Visitor

- Posts: 9
Points: 0
Reputation: 0
Join date: 2008-06-20
Age: 19
Location: England
Re: Proving Goldbach's conjecture.
To smart for me ^^ sooo ima say something to do with maths ... USE SUBTRACTION!

Devanator- Azure Lieutenant

- Posts: 268
Points: 0
Reputation: 0
Join date: 2008-05-28
Age: 17
Location: Shottingham, BRAP O.o
Re: Proving Goldbach's conjecture.
i fucking hate the word 'theorem'
DoTheDannyBoy- Azure Soldier

- Posts: 50
Points: 0
Reputation: 0
Join date: 2008-05-28
Re: Proving Goldbach's conjecture.
theorem theorem theorem
=]
=]
_________________
[Az]Azure(7thAzure)/ArIzumi(Arashi)/StAugust(Abyss)


Izumi- Prince of Azure

- Posts: 692
Points: 129
Reputation: 0
Join date: 2008-05-28
Location: Azure
Re: Proving Goldbach's conjecture.
aha, this channel seems to be a joke to almost everyone, its a shame that all of us dont have anything in common when it comes to "serious issues"
digg_- Azure Servant

- Posts: 43
Points: 0
Reputation: 0
Join date: 2008-06-14
Age: 19
Location: hfx canada
Permissions of this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum






